Question

Read the passage.

Bike lanes are meant to protect cyclists, not to provoke them. Adding bike lanes to South Drive was a way to separate cars and bikes to keep cyclists safe. The two-lane road was dangerous. But the bike lane has made things worse. Now cars are stuck in a single lane. Traffic is a mess, and cars are veering into bike lanes. Bikes are jumping curbs to avoid getting hit by turning cars. Did the city planners lose their tape measures?

What is the claim of this editorial?

A,) The cyclists on South Drive have jumped curbs to avoid cars.
B.) The traffic on South Drive has been reduced to a single lane.
c.) The South Drive bike lane has caused problems for everyone.
D.) South Drive should have a bike lane in order to keep cyclists safe.

Answer 1

I would say c as well

Step-by-step explanation:

The main idea in the editorial is about the roads becoming dangerous in consequence of there being a bike lane

Answer 2

C would be your answer !