Answer:
Based on the given information, Feature 1 appears to be safer compared to Feature 2.
The failure rate is a measure of the likelihood of a safety feature to fail or not function as intended. A lower failure rate indicates a safer feature.
In this case, the mean (average) failure rate for Feature 1 is 2%, while the mean failure rate for Feature 2 is 18%. This means that, on average, Feature 1 has a lower failure rate compared to Feature 2.
Additionally, the range is another important measure of safety. The range represents the difference between the highest and lowest values in a set of data. A smaller range indicates a more consistent performance of the safety feature.
In this case, Feature 1 has a range of 18, while Feature 2 has a range of 2. This means that Feature 2 has a smaller range, indicating more consistent performance, compared to Feature 1.
Based on both the mean failure rate and the range, Feature 1 appears to be safer than Feature 2, as it has a lower average failure rate and a larger range, indicating more variability in its performance. However, it's important to consider other factors and conduct a comprehensive analysis before making a definitive conclusion about the safety of the two features.
Explanation:
Please read this all. ;)