Register
Do u think promary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians today
61.0k views
5 votes
Do u think promary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians today

User Guilhem Prev
by
4.3k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Primary Sources

Step-by-step explanation:

They are found from real history, whereas secondary sources are books written by someone who hypothisized what happenned. Hope it helps.

User TimSalabim
by
4.5k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.2m questions

6.7m answers

Other Questions

Great Britain is an example of a: O A. Dictatorship O B. Republic with unitary system O C. Constitution monarchy with parliamentary system D. Oligarchy with federalist system​
Is there a correlation between the size of an empire and the amount of power it holds in the world?
What was the effect of the rise of the mass media during the 1920s? A) It led to increased membership in labor unions. B) It contributed to the development of a national culture. C) It caused mass migration
Name African Amer 1. What was the Middle Passage in the Slave Trade?
Which statement about genghis khan is true
Link Copied!