Final answer:
John Proctor's decision in 'The Crucible' is a moral dilemma that weighs personal integrity against survival and familial responsibility, and its 'rightness' is subjective to individual values.
Step-by-step explanation:
The decision of John Proctor in Arthur Miller's The Crucible is a complex one, and whether it was the right decision can be debated. Proctor chose to maintain his integrity rather than confess to a lie, ultimately leading to his execution. This choice can be viewed as right because it upheld his personal values and morals, asserting the importance of truth and personal integrity over life itself. On the other hand, one might argue that it was wrong because it led to his death and the suffering of his family. Whether I would have done the same is subjective; it would depend on the weight given to personal integrity versus the responsibility to one's family and the instinct for self-preservation.