125k views
3 votes
4. HISTORY During World War I, it was a crime to criticize the president or the war effort. Would a court today find such a law as a

constitutionally valid interpretation of the First Amendment? Why or why not?

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

watch me wep watch me neyney ey

User Daniel Reis
by
4.8k points
2 votes
Back then seditious libel against government officials was really a denied freedom. It’s safe to say nowadays people are welcome to critique the presidents policies and affairs openly. Yes they would find it valid because the structure of the constitution is what we base our legal codes, there are 5 freedoms that come with free speech and the government can’t deny that liberty.
User Byron Hawkins
by
5.7k points