199k views
2 votes
HELP ME ASAP Why did Vehicle 2 fall off the cliff in Claire's test of the collision scene, but Vehicle 2 did not fall off the cliff in the film Iceworld Revenge?

Claim 1: The vehicles in Iceworld Revenge had different masses; in Claire’s test, the vehicles had the same mass.

Claim 2: The friction of the surface that was used in Iceworld Revenge was different from the friction of the surface in Claire’s test.

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Vehicle 2's different behavior in Claire's test versus the film scene can be explained by physics principles like momentum, mass variation, and friction differences affecting post-collision outcomes. Conservation of momentum determines the motion of colliding objects, while kinetic energy loss indicates the inelastic nature of the collision.

Step-by-step explanation:

The discrepancy between Vehicle 2 falling off the cliff in Claire's test and not falling off in the film Iceworld Revenge can be analyzed through the principles of physics, specifically looking at momentum, mass, friction, and energy conservation during a collision. Claim 1 suggests a difference in mass of the vehicles, which would influence the outcome post-collision due to momentum conservation. In a collision with different masses, the heavier vehicle will typically have a smaller change in velocity. Claim 2 suggests that the surface friction in Claire's test was different from the one in the movie, which would affect the vehicles' ability to stay on the cliff post-impact. Higher friction could offer more resistance to slipping, while a surface with lower friction (like ice) would provide less resistance and could lead to the vehicle falling off.

Concepts of momentum and kinetic energy loss in collisions

In the scenario presented, when two objects collide and stick together, their total momentum before collision equals their total momentum after the collision, assuming no external forces act on them (negligible friction). The conservation of momentum can be used to calculate the final velocity of the objects after collision. Regarding kinetic energy, not all collisions are perfectly elastic; some kinetic energy can be transformed into other forms of energy, such as deformation or heat, in inelastic collisions. If a collision results in the objects sticking together, it is an inelastic collision and some kinetic energy is indeed lost.

Understanding these principles, we can analyze the outcomes of car collisions based on the mass of the cars, their velocities, and the friction of the surfaces involved, which helps in reconstructing and making sense of collision scenes such as the one described in the students' questions.

User Qasim Khokhar
by
8.4k points