195k views
4 votes
Please, I need Help

A state builder is one who has “built” up their nation to be a strong nation and has done so through positive means. A tyrant is one who has “built” up their nation to be a strong nation through sometimes negative/ oppressive means. After examining the absolute rule that developed in Spain, France, Russia, Central Europe, and even Asia, respond to the following question by writing a 5 paragraph essay: Should absolute rulers be remembered as state builders or tyrants?

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Absolute rulers can be remembered as both state builders and tyrants, depending on their methods and impact on their nations.

Step-by-step explanation:

Absolute rulers can be remembered as both state builders and tyrants, depending on their methods and impact on their nations. Some absolute rulers, such as Napoleon and Anwar Sadat, are credited with advancing their people's standard of living and promoting economic development. They exercised a moderate amount of evenhandedness and implemented policies that benefited their citizens.

On the other hand, there have been absolute rulers, like Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Saddam Hussein, who grossly abused their power and led through fear and intimidation. They oppressed their people, violated basic human rights, and caused immense suffering and loss of life.

It is important to consider both the positive and negative aspects of an absolute ruler's reign when assessing their legacy. While some may have contributed to the growth and development of their nations, others caused untold harm and should be remembered as tyrants.

User Ehsan Ullah Nazir
by
4.7k points