Final answer:
Kristof primarily employs logical evidence and quantitative data as part of his rhetorical strategy, focusing on the logical appeal or logos. His argument is strengthened by combining facts and statistics with a sound logical structure that is persuasive across various fields of study.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kristof primarily utilizes logical evidence and quantitative data to craft a convincing argument. By appealing to logic through the strategic use of statistics and factual information, Kristof enhances the impact and credibility of his argument. This is aligned with the rhetorical strategy of logos, which focuses on using logical reason and evidence to persuade.
Different fields have varying standards for what constitutes solid evidence, and in the context of making an argument in English, it's important to understand what is valued. An English instructor might prioritize a logical progression of points and textual analysis, whereas a sociology instructor might favor empirical data and statistical analysis.
Aside from logical evidence, Kristof avoids relying solely on anecdotal evidence, enhancing his argument with a robust deployment of statistical evidence. This combination of rhetoric and evidence type is often more persuasive to readers, according to Evans. It's productive to consider various rhetorical appeals like ethos, logos, pathos, and kairos when presenting an argument, as well as ensuring the logic is credible and relevant points have not been omitted.