menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
do you agree or disagree with Hamilton and Madison's initial logic that the Bill of Rights was essentially unnecessary? Explain.
asked
Dec 13, 2021
196k
views
0
votes
do you agree or disagree with Hamilton and Madison's initial logic that the Bill of Rights was essentially unnecessary? Explain.
History
high-school
Matthes
asked
by
Matthes
4.6k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
5
votes
No, I do not agree with their view. Hamilton and Madison believed that a bill of rights would limit the rights that would be protected by the constitution, because some rights would be specified while others wouldn't.
Arpit Goyal
answered
Dec 20, 2021
by
Arpit Goyal
5.3k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
4.6m
questions
6.0m
answers
Other Questions
Is there a correlation between the size of an empire and the amount of power it holds in the world?
Which of the following was a cause of the French and Indian War? A Arguments about the prices Indians were paid for the furs they trapped for the British B Disagreements between the French and British
What is some nigerian history
What were the midnight appointments and how did they lead to judicial review?
What is the meaning of federalism
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org