Register
50 POINTS: PLEASE ANSWER AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE! Question: After getting their results in, a group of scientists went back and looked at their study. As planned, their experiment consisted of three groups.
87.1k views
4 votes
50 POINTS: PLEASE ANSWER AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE!

Question:

After getting their results in, a group of scientists went back and looked at their study. As planned, their experiment consisted of three groups. The first group received a new medicine at a normal dose, the second group received the medicine at half the dose, and the third group received the medicine at twice the dose.

Which of the following best describes what went wrong with the scientists’ study?


Choices:

- an improper experimental procedure

- the lack of a control group

- selection bias

- human error

User Jonathan Burley
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

0 votes
The answer would be “the lack of a control group.” To make the results more accurate, the scientists should have used a placebo group to use as a comparison.
User Edgar Asatryan
by
8.1k points
7 votes

Step-by-step explanation:

The lack of a control group

User Brki
by
8.7k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

No related questions found

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

Compare and contrast an electric generator and a battery??
How do you balance __H2SO4 + __B(OH)3 --> __B2(SO4)3 + __H2O
Can someone complete the chemical reactions, or write which one do not occur, and provide tehir types? *c2h4+h2o *c3h8 + hcl *c2h2+br2 *c4h10+br2 *c3h6+br2
As an object’s temperature increases, the ____________________ at which it radiates energy increases.
Why is gold preferred as a superior metal over silver and bronze?
Link Copied!