131k views
1 vote
Read the excerpt below and answer the question. They did not take kindly to trace and trail. With the exception of the two mongrels, they were bewildered and spirit-broken by the strange savage environment in which they found themselves, and by the ill treatment they had received. This description of the outside dogs foreshadows their

User Anil Sidhu
by
5.2k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

Early death on trail

Step-by-step explanation:

in book call of the wild it says, "There that day when bilee, the good-natured, fell and could not rise. Hal had traded off his revolver, so he took the axe and knocked bille on the head as he lay in the traces, then cut the carcass out of the harness and dragged it to one did. Buck saw, what his mates saw, and they knew that this thing was very close to them. On the next day Koona went but five of them remained." So it would mean early death on the trail because of how they are treated they starve and become weak so they can't do what hal wants them to do so he kills them if they fall and don't get up.

hope this helps someone=) K. DeLaine I.

User Maxim Zabolotskikh
by
5.4k points
4 votes

Read the excerpt below and answer the question.

They did not take kindly to trace and trail. With the exception of the two mongrels, they were bewildered and spirit-broken by the strange savage environment in which they found themselves, and by the ill treatment they had received.

This description of the outside dogs foreshadows their _____.

early death on the trail

eventual revolt

relationship to Buck

starvation

Answer:

Eventual revolt

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the excerpt from Call of the Wild, the dogs did not take kindly to trace and trail because they were broken in spirit and tired, both by the situation they found themselves in and the ill treatment they received and this description foreshadows their eventual revolt from their masters.

User NaveenBharadwaj
by
6.0k points