208k views
2 votes
Given: Line segment N M is parallel to line segment P O. and Angle 1 is-congruent-to angle 3 Prove: Line segment N M is parallel to line segment N O. What is the missing reason in the proof?given transitive property alternate interior angles theorem converse alternate interior angles theorem

Given: Line segment N M is parallel to line segment P O. and Angle 1 is-congruent-example-1
Given: Line segment N M is parallel to line segment P O. and Angle 1 is-congruent-example-1
Given: Line segment N M is parallel to line segment P O. and Angle 1 is-congruent-example-2
User Hong Wei
by
6.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

yeah its parrellell

Explanation:

User Scotty Bollinger
by
6.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.