Answer:
Literally, parallel lines are lines that extend in both directions without meeting.
The three definitions of parallel lines are correct, but Rachel's and Briana's definitions have flaws
Explanation:
Rachel
The definition implies that two lines are said to be parallel if they are both perpendicular to another line.
This definition is correct, but the definition brings a new concept; it introduces the concept of line transversal.
Because the parallel lines can be defined without introducing the concept of line transversal (which was not part of the required definition), then we can conclude that the definition has a drawback.
Alex
Alex's definition is correct, and it has no drawback because the definition can be applied to concepts where parallel lines are used.
Briana
Here, Brianna introduced the concept of slopes.
Ideally, parallel lines have the same slope; but the concept is limited to slopes only; and cannot be applied to other concepts such as transversal of lines.