Final answer:
Option D can be inferred from paragraph 7 as it highlights that focusing solely on fairness as a living standard can have unintended consequences. While fairness is essential, it's just one aspect of governance that needs to be balanced against other factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering what can be inferred from paragraph 7 of “Life isn’t fair- deal with it,” it would be reasonable to select option D. There are consequences when we treat fairness as a standard of living. The passage suggests that while fairness is an ideal to strive for in society, focusing solely on fairness without considering efficiency, productivity, or the broader consequences can lead to challenges. The mention of distributive justice and the balance that a government tries to achieve implies that there may be negative outcomes if fairness is treated as the ultimate goal without recognizing other factors.
For instance, economic policies designed to promote income equality can lead to higher overall economic output and benefit society at large. However, the pursuit of absolute fairness without pragmatism could also hinder progress and growth. The cited excerpts suggest the idea that while fairness is important, it is part of a complex array of factors that must be balanced by leaders and governments to achieve effective governance and social welfare.