Answer:
At a significance level of 0.1 (90% reliability), there is not enough evidence to support the claim that there is significant difference in mean mineral deposits in the two holes.
Explanation:
This is a matched-pair t-test for the difference.
We have to calculate the difference d for each pair, and then treat his as the sample for our test.
For example, the difference for the first pair is:
![d_1=X_(1h,1)-X_(2h,1)=5.5-5.7=-0.2](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/kzc482ozkctzqnh6migjo7gbdjdjz8nh0v.png)
Then, the sample for the differences between each pair is:
![d=[-0.2 , -0.2 , -0.1 , 2.6 , 0.7 , 0.9 , 1.7 , -1.6 , 1 , 1.1 , -1.7 , -0.3 , 0.1 , -1.5 , -1.2]](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/lrbgssij1o793zrbmfgk4a0dt1n85ik7lt.png)
The sample mean and standard deviation are:
![M=(1)/(n)\sum_(i=1)^n\,x_i\\\\\\M=(1)/(15)((-0.2)+(-0.2)+(-0.1)+. . .+(-1.2))\\\\\\M=(1.3)/(15)\\\\\\M=0.09\\\\\\s=\sqrt{(1)/(n-1)\sum_(i=1)^n\,(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{(1)/(14)((-0.2-0.09)^2+(-0.2-0.09)^2+(-0.1-0.09)^2+. . . +(-1.2-0.09)^2)}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{(22.38)/(14)}\\\\\\s=√(1.6)=1.26\\\\\\](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/qgwhup4iduyxrzv0uhtht1g6ff82hrx2mm.png)
The claim is that there is significant difference in mean mineral deposits in the two holes.
Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:
![H_0: \mu=0\\\\H_a:\mu> 0](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/guaravfqumhixc5urt8y9ngzyu3osejdfr.png)
The significance level is 0.1.
The sample has a size n=15.
The sample mean is M=0.09.
As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=1.26.
The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:
![s_M=(s)/(√(n))=(1.26)/(√(15))=0.325](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/of4j686mc780gj20q323q5oc6xq82kxzwd.png)
Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:
![t=(M-\mu)/(s/√(n))=(0.09-0)/(0.325)=(0.09)/(0.325)=0.277](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/o1wl7tzozr308r7tgxkxc6sy7rl5e0z2m7.png)
The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:
![df=n-1=15-1=14](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/j0wzd7jnnw33vqxm9cswugx9kqoaels51o.png)
This test is a right-tailed test, with 14 degrees of freedom and t=0.277, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):
As the P-value (0.393) is bigger than the significance level (0.1), the effect is not significant.
The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.
At a significance level of 0.1, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that there is significant difference in mean mineral deposits in the two holes.