210k views
3 votes
A survey of 436 workers showed that 192 of them said that it was seriously unethical to monitor employee e-mail. When 121 senior-level bosses were surveyed, 40 said that it was seriously unethical to monitor employee e-mail. Find 99% confidence interval to test the claim that for those saying that monitoring e-mail is seriously unethical, the proportion of employees and the proportion of bosses are different.

User Jbrtrnd
by
5.7k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

99% confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of employees and the proportion of bosses who says that monitoring e-mail is seriously unethical is [-0.016 , 0.236].

Explanation:

We are given that a survey of 436 workers showed that 192 of them said that it was seriously unethical to monitor employee e-mail.

When 121 senior-level bosses were surveyed, 40 said that it was seriously unethical to monitor employee e-mail.

Firstly, the Pivotal quantity for 99% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion is given by;

P.Q. =
\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{(\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1))/(n_1)+(\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2))/(n_2) } } ~ N(0,1)

where,
\hat p_1 = sample proportion of employees who say that monitoring e-mail is seriously unethical =
(192)/(436) = 0.44


\hat p_2 = sample proportion of senior-level bosses who say that monitoring e-mail is seriously unethical =
(40)/(121) = 0.33


n_1 = sample of employees = 436


n_2 = sample of senior-level bosses = 121

Here for constructing 99% confidence interval we have used Two-sample z test for proportions.

So, 99% confidence interval for the difference in proportion, (
p_1-p_2) is ;

P(-2.58 < N(0,1) < 2.58) = 0.99 {As the critical value of z at 0.5% level

of significance are -2.58 & 2.58}

P(-2.58 <
\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{(\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1))/(n_1)+(\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2))/(n_2) } } < 2.58) = 0.99

P(
-2.58 * {\sqrt{(\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1))/(n_1)+(\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2))/(n_2) } } <
{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)} <
2.58 * {\sqrt{(\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1))/(n_1)+(\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2))/(n_2) } } ) = 0.99

P(
(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-2.58 * {\sqrt{(\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1))/(n_1)+(\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2))/(n_2) } } < (
p_1-p_2) <
(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)+2.58 * {\sqrt{(\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1))/(n_1)+(\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2))/(n_2) } } ) = 0.99

99% confidence interval for (
p_1-p_2) =

[
(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-2.58 * {\sqrt{(\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1))/(n_1)+(\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2))/(n_2) } } ,
(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)+2.58 * {\sqrt{(\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1))/(n_1)+(\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2))/(n_2) } }]

= [
(0.44-0.33)-2.58 * {\sqrt{(0.44(1-0.44))/(436)+(0.33(1-0.33))/(121) } } ,
(0.44-0.33)+2.58 * {\sqrt{(0.44(1-0.44))/(436)+(0.33(1-0.33))/(121) } } ]

= [-0.016 , 0.236]

Therefore, 99% confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of employees and the proportion of bosses who says that monitoring e-mail is seriously unethical is [-0.016 , 0.236].

User Talegna
by
6.4k points