Final answer:
The questions deal with assessing arguments and evidence in textual or visual arguments, considering the credibility and type of evidence used. Evaluators look for factual support, logical reasoning, and credible sources to determine an argument's strength. Refutational strategies and the soundness of conclusions are pertinent to argument analysis.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's question seems to refer to analyzing arguments and evidence in various texts or debates. Typically, when assessing an argument made by a person such as 'Lake' or 'Darwall', one looks at the claims made and the supporting evidence presented. For example, if Dr. Lakeby is arguing that past events in a house have affected Mildred in certain ways, one would expect him to offer empirical or rational support for his claims, perhaps citing psychological studies or providing objective accounts of Mildred's behavior. Meanwhile, if someone like 'Trevor' is presenting an argument, the quality of his evidence, like facts, statistics, or examples, as well as the credibility of his sources, are crucial in evaluating the strength of his argument.
A cartoonist making an argument would use visual elements and possibly text to convey a point, and the effectiveness of this argument would depend on how convincing these elements are to the viewer. For scholarly arguments, such as those by 'Jones' or 'Desmond', one would expect textual evidence or statistical evidence to support their claims, showing a reliance on logical evidence rather than merely anecdotal accounts.
In the analysis of arguments, recognizing refutational strategies, the introduction of evidence, and the overall soundness of conclusions are key to understanding the arguments being made.