Question

Stolen Purses. Sandra and Mary were having lunch at their favorite restaurant. Unfortunately, a thief stole their purses containing their ATM cards. Mary notified her bank the next day of the theft of the ATM card. Unfortunately, the card had already been used to fraudulently obtain over $1,000. Sandra thought back to her business law class and did not call her bank, however, because she believed that she would not be liable for any charges on the ATM card because of the rules involving forgeries. Nevertheless, a week or so later when Sandra was in the bank, she casually mentioned to the teller that she needed a new card because hers had been lost. She was shocked when a bank representative attempted to hold her responsible for hundreds of dollars of goods purchased with the ATM card. Sandra told the bank representative that she refused to cover the amounts, that she was moving her account, and that she wanted all preauthorized payments and EFTs stopped immediately. For how much can the bank hold Mary responsible based on the fraudulent use of the card?

Answer 1

Bank will hold Mary accountable supported the deceitful use of the cardboard is $500

Note: Bank can’t make Mary answerable for the complete stolen amount from her ATM, as she conversant the bank at intervals every week when the cardboard was stolen, during these circumstance if the bank is informed about the stolen ATM directly the client is accountable for $50 in losses, whereas if they inform when three days quantity raise to $500 in losses.