Question

Plz reply fast

Sharil wrote an argument in favor of starting a rock-climbing club at her school as a fun and safe activity. She then came across a source claiming that rock climbers have an increased risk of developing wrist and ankle injuries because rock climbing places pressure on the joints, which can cause sprains.

How can Sharil best adjust her argument based on this new information, while still keeping her claim the same?

by going back through her original essay and removing every direct reference to rock climbing or rock walls

by not referring to this new information in her argument and instead focusing on what she has already learned

by arguing that the increased risk of wrist and ankle injuries should be ignored since it is not a serious problem

by recognizing the risks but arguing that students can avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right equipment

Answer 1

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

Answer: By recognizing the risks but arguing that students can avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right equipment (Last Answer)

Explanation:

You shouldn't ignore the argument because then you'll very bias. People should always acknowledge it.