Question

Relying on the plain view doctrine, the Minnesota v. Dickerson ruling stated that officers could seize non-threatening contraband, such as drugs, if its identity as contraband is immediately apparent to the sense of touch. This exception is best known as the:_______.

a. reasonable grasp motion.
b. plain touch exception.
c. plain view doctrine.
d. one-motion grasp exception.

Answer 1

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Relying on the plain view doctrine, the Minnesota v. Dickerson ruling stated that officers could seize non-threatening contraband, such as drugs, if its identity as contraband is immediately apparent to the sense of touch. This exception is best known as the: plain touch exception.

Plain touch doctrine is a criminal law that allows a police officer to seize without a warrant any contraband that the officer can immediately and clearly identify, by touch during a pat-down search. However, this type of searches are permittable without a warrant on the basis of reasonable suspicion less than probable cause must be strictly limited to that which is necessary for the discovery of weapons which might be used to harm the officer or others nearby. The standard was set as a result of the case Minnesota. v. Dickerson ruling.