Final answer:
The Supreme Court is most likely to review cases involving presidential actions and challenges to federal law, as these typically have a substantial impact on federal policy and constitutional law.
Step-by-step explanation:
Types of Cases Reviewed by the Supreme Court
The United States Supreme Court is highly selective in the cases it chooses to review. The Court operates as the final court of appeal and typically hears cases that involve issues of national importance, such as challenges to federal law or actions by the presidential branch. Two types of cases the Supreme Court would be most likely to review are those concerning presidential actions and cases in which a federal law is challenged. These cases often have broader implications for federal policy and constitutional law.
Cases involving motor vehicle accidents are usually resolved in State Courts unless there is a significant federal issue at stake. Cases involving members of Congress in their personal capacity would not typically reach the Supreme Court unless they raise substantial federal questions. The Supreme Court has the authority to declare laws and executive actions unconstitutional, which is known as judicial review. This power places the Court in a critical position in interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that the laws and actions of the government comply with it.
When cases come directly from state courts, it is usually because they present a substantive federal question, meaning that they involve the interpretation or application of the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Thus, the two correct options indicate that the Supreme Court's purview is best suited for major federal issues and constitutional matters rather than state issues or individual discrepancies that lack broader federal significance.