Final answer:
Social location, which considers factors like power, class, and occupation, could explain why a politician faces no consequences for employing illegal immigrants compared to a restaurant that is fined, highlighting the impact of an individual's position within society on the enforcement of laws.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of social location could explain the discrepancy between the politician not facing consequences and the restaurant being fined for employing illegal immigrants. Social location refers to the position of an individual within the society based on various factors such as race, ethnicity, gender, class, and occupation. The politician, likely having a higher social status and more power within society, might evade sanction due to the privilege and influence their position affords them. This contrasts with the restaurant which, while possibly an economic entity, does not have the same level of protective influence and is thus held accountable under the law.
Furthermore, the unequal enforcement highlights systemic issues in how laws are applied, possibly due to power dynamics and resources, which can afford certain individuals or groups more protection against legal consequences. While the law was intended to deter employers from hiring undocumented immigrants, disparities in how it is enforced reflect the complex interplay between social location and the legal system.