Question

Should policy analysts and policymakers try to deal wit the fundamental causes of social problems such as crime, poverty, or homelessness, or aim instead for a more pragmatic and limited approach that may be more realistic and more politically acceptable? Why do you think so?

Answer 1

Policy analysts and policymakers must choose between addressing deep-rooted causes of social issues or adopting pragmatic, limited solutions that are more easily enacted. Cost-benefit analysis is essential in evaluating approaches like prevention and rehabilitation. A blend of in-depth and pragmatic solutions tailored to specific circumstances might be ideal.

Step-by-step explanation:

Policy analysts and policymakers face a complex dilemma when addressing social issues like crime, poverty, and homelessness. On one hand, addressing fundamental causes can be seen as a more sustainable, although challenging, approach. It aims at the root problems such as addiction, mental illness, and systemic poverty. On the other hand, a more pragmatic and limited approach may focus on immediately actionable and politically palatable solutions, without necessarily tackling the deeper underlying issues. These might include policies like increasing the minimum wage, or extending unemployment benefits to alleviate poverty's symptoms.

The complexity arises when considering effectiveness, political acceptance, and the potential for real change. Ultimately, the cost-benefit analysis of different approaches, whether it's prevention, incarceration, rehabilitation, or restorative justice, plays a critical role in determining the strategies employed to mitigate these social issues. The ideal approach may blend both the pragmatic and the fundamental solutions, tailored to specific contexts and types of crime or social challenges, considering the long-term sustainability and overall societal impact.

Sociological perspectives highlight the importance of understanding environmental influences and behavior patterns that lead to social problems. Moreover, comprehensive analysis ensures that decision makers are fully informed about the implications of potential policies. Whether addressing crime, providing financial assistance to the poor, or considering labor market opportunities, the ultimate goal remains to improve societal outcomes and promote public welfare.

Answer 2

Answer:I think they should try to deal wit the fundamental causes of social problems.

Explanation:you can deal with an issue in as practical and real way as you can but if the causes are not dealt with, this will mean the issue will come back and keep coming back no matter how hard you deal with it. Only if you tackle the cause of these problems you can then be assured that their effect are likely to decrease.