Register
In the Supreme Court case of Worcester v Georgia (1832) the supreme court ruled. . . A)only the state government could regulate Native Americans B)Native Americans were under no obligation to follow treaty
105k views
5 votes
In the Supreme Court case of Worcester v Georgia (1832) the supreme court ruled. . .

A)only the state government could regulate Native Americans
B)Native Americans were under no obligation to follow treaty guidelines
C)only the federal government could regulate Native Americans
D)only state government could make treaties with the Native Americans

User NewStack
by
5.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was ... The Court did not ask federal marshals to carry out the decision ...

Step-by-step explanation:

User ForgottenUmbrella
by
5.0k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.2m questions

6.8m answers

Other Questions

Great Britain is an example of a: O A. Dictatorship O B. Republic with unitary system O C. Constitution monarchy with parliamentary system D. Oligarchy with federalist system​
Is there a correlation between the size of an empire and the amount of power it holds in the world?
What was the effect of the rise of the mass media during the 1920s? A) It led to increased membership in labor unions. B) It contributed to the development of a national culture. C) It caused mass migration
Which statement about genghis khan is true
What scientific instrument allowed Antonie van Leeuwenhoek to discover bacteria? A.)microscope B.)glasses C.)magnifying glass D.)telescope
Link Copied!