Question

Explain how social thinkers misapplied Charles Darwin's ideas to justify massive disparities in wealth and power and to deny government a role in equalizing opportunity?

Answer 1

Social thinkers misapplied Darwin's ideas through Social Darwinism to justify wealth disparities and deny government intervention in equalizing opportunity.

Step-by-step explanation:

Social thinkers misapplied Charles Darwin's ideas to justify massive disparities in wealth and power and to deny government a role in equalizing opportunity through a concept known as Social Darwinism. This concept proposed that success and power in society were the result of superior breeding and that the rich deserved their wealth while the poor deserved their poverty due to their biological traits. It wrongly applied Darwin's theory of evolution to human society, leading to the denial of government intervention to equalize opportunity.

Answer 2

Social thinkers who misapplied Darwin's idea believed industrial corporations to be much more superior and hence should not have restricted its actions using laws that provided assistance to the poor people or those that regulate working conditions. These set of people believed that poor people actually made themselves so because they lack the character to be rich, stating that the poor always depended on the government to provide for them rather than practicing personal economics. This resulted to the government spending time to know the difference in poor people who deserves help and those who don't, rather than helping the poor in general.

Step-by-step explanation:

Social thinkers who misapplied Darwin's idea believed industrial corporations to be much more superior and hence should not have restricted its actions using laws that provided assistance to the poor people or those that regulate working conditions. These set of people believed that poor people actually made themselves so because they lack the character to be rich, stating that the poor always depended on the government to provide for them rather than practicing personal economics. This resulted to the government spending time to know the difference in poor people who deserves help and those who don't, rather than helping the poor in general.