Question

How did Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points differ from the Paris Peace

Conference agreements?
A. The Fourteen Points limited the size of countries' militaries, while
the Paris Peace Conference decided that strong militaries were
necessary to prevent future wars.
O
B. The Fourteen Points argued that no country should be punished
for the war, while the Paris Peace Conference called for harsh
punishments for Germany.
O
C. The Fourteen Points called for self-determination in Austro-
Hungarian territory, while the Paris Peace Conference divided this
territory between other European empires.
D. The Fourteen Points supported the establishment of a League of
Nations, while the Paris Peace Conference refused to accept any
international organizations.

Answer 1

B.

Step-by-step explanation:

B. The Fourteen Points argued that no country should be punished

for the war, while the Paris Peace Conference called for harsh

punishments for Germany.

Answer 2

The correct answer is letter B

Under the treaty of the 14 points, nations should no longer enter into diplomatic agreements that are not publicly recognized. In addition, he believed that free navigation and deliberate trade between nations would strengthen the link and international cooperation. With regard to militarism, he believed that military apparatus should be restricted only to what was necessary for the maintenance of national security.

While the Paris Peace Conference was the meeting held from January 18, 1919. The main objective of this meeting was to agree on conditions of peace with the countries of the axis, among them Great Britain, France and the United States.