Question

Discuss whether or not something has to be "fun" to be considered a game. Defend one position but include at least one argument for each side; you may include "one scholar argued that XYZ" as an argument for/against your position.​

Answer 1

well, if its not fun, then its not really played, and then it becomes forgotten like the game almost doesn't exist making it not a game?

Step-by-step explanation:

da answer above is better ._.

Answer 2

Games do not have to be fun to be games. But most are fun. Games can just be a more interesting form of a simulation, a platformer, or a digital universe you may be interested in. For that very case, one scholar argued that, "Games are games, and fun is games, too." And then, another scholar argued, "Games should be fun." Lastly, a 3rd argues that games do not have to be fun, supporting our opinion. With this knowledge, no further, we come to a conclusion.

In conclusion, games are just an interesting escape from our everyday lives. They do not have to be fun. They just need to be good.