Register
I need someone smart! why is the multiverse considered a theory if it has no observational or experimental evidence? shouldn't it be considered a plausible hypothesis instead, sense it has no evidence
84.6k views
0 votes
I need someone smart!

why is the multiverse considered a theory if it has no observational or experimental evidence?
shouldn't it be considered a plausible hypothesis instead, sense it has no evidence but is lickely the case?

User Polyvertex
by
5.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

It is a theory

Step-by-step explanation:

There’s no form or proof or anything even tho it is a hypothesis it’s common and has no evidence due towards it

User Dlaor
by
5.1k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.1m questions

6.7m answers

Other Questions

A space shuttle is approaching the surface of the moon to land. It approaches the moons surface with an initial velocity of 28m/s and is slowing at a rate of -2m/s^2. Show all work and units for problems.
________ is a measure of the internal energy that has been absorbed or transferred from one body to another, often due to a difference in temperature.
5. What happens to the arrangement of water molecules as ice melts? A Molecules gain enough energy to escape as vapor. B Molecules release enough energy to escape as vapor. C Molecules gain enough energy
A projectline is shot from the edge of a cliff 100 m above the ground with intial speed 10 m/s at an angle 30 with the horizontal. 1) determine the time taken by the projectile motion to hit the ground
A 2.0-N force acts horizontally on a 10-N block that is initially at rest on a horizontal surface. The coefficient of static friction between the block and the surface is 0.50. Suppose that the block now
Link Copied!