176k views
5 votes
NEED HELP ASAP How did Daniel Webster and John Calhoun differ in their opinions about state government?

O Webster believed that the state governments were given many powers by the Constitution, while
Calhoun believed states had limited powers based on the Constitution.
O Webster believed that the state governments voluntarily entered into an agreement with the federal
government, while Calhoun believed that the agreement was forced upon the states.
O Webster believed that the state governments had no say over federal laws, but Calhoun believed that
states had the right to ignore federal laws.

O Webster believed that the state governments lacked any rights, while Calhoun believed that state
governments had rights that the federal government granted to them.

User Olshevski
by
4.7k points

1 Answer

9 votes
Answer:
C. Webster believed that the state governments had no say over federal laws, but Calhoun believed that states had the right to ignore federal laws.

Hope this helps! :)
User Juergen Schulze
by
4.7k points