Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of its primary source when analyzing a historical event? Answer: To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event.

My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites

Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question

asked May 27, 2022 142k views

3 votes

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of its primary source when analyzing a historical event?

Answer: To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event.

History
high-school

Kumesana asked

by Kumesana

5.6k points

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

Yes they will look at other sourses so they could analyze other research results.

Step-by-step explanation:

yes

KennyV answered Jun 3, 2022

by KennyV

4.9k points

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Ask a Question

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.2m questions

6.8m answers

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Other Questions