Question

World War II is often referred to as the "Good War." Evaluate that title for the war. Is it appropriate? Why or why not?

Answer 1

The title 'The Good War' for World War II is simplistic, acknowledging the just cause against tyranny but neglecting the immense cost and complexities of the conflict. It leaves out the sacrifices of the Soviet Union and the war's impact on the United States' own society.

Step-by-step explanation:

Evaluating the Title "The Good War" for World War II

The phrase "The Good War" is often used to describe World War II due to the clear moral cause seen in opposing the aggression and atrocities committed by the Axis powers, particularly Nazi Germany. The Allied victory is celebrated for ending the Holocaust, liberating occupied countries, and setting the stage for new international institutions like the United Nations. However, this characterization overlooks the complexities of the war, including the vast destruction, loss of life, and the ethical dilemmas surrounding strategic bombings and the use of nuclear weapons.

The contributions of the Soviet Union were pivotal in the eastern front, despite the totalitarian nature of the Soviet regime. It is essential to recognize the vast sacrifices made by the Soviet people, without which the outcome of the war might have been different. The Allied powers, including the United States and Britain, played vital roles but did not face the war machine alone. Furthermore, while the war did help the U.S. emerge from the Great Depression, it also highlighted and sometimes exacerbated the country's own racial and ethnic divisions.

Ultimately, the title "The Good War" can be seen as oversimplified. World War II was fought for justified reasons but at an unprecedented cost of human life and suffering. It is crucial to approach its history with nuance and recognition of all aspects, both positive and negative.

Answer 2

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

American author Howard Zinn commented in his book "A People's History of the United States," that World War II was considered to be a people's war or a good war in that it united different parts of society, different belief systems, different religions, through a common goal: to defend the country against the threat of Adolph Hitler and fascism.

In a situation like this, people would cooperate and surrender to obey the indications and legislation enacted by the government in order to be ready to support the country in any way. If it is for a major cause and to defend freedom and democracy, people cooperate and support government decisions. This unity is good for the strength of the country and the support of the citizens.