The question is incomplete. The complete question is :
For a project being considered by a city, the following cost data is available. (a) Determine both the modified and conventional B/C ratios and offer a recommendation, and (b) if you are concerned because the data is not capturing the effects of Estimated annual disbenefits, how large would these have to be in order for you to change your recommendation (if at all) using the conventional B/C ratio?
Initial cost = $10,000,000
O & M cost / year = $450,000
Estimated annual benefits = $850,000
Life = 25 Years
Salvage value = $1 million
MARR = 6%
Solution :
Given :
Initial cost = $10,000,000
Salvage, S = $1,000,000
O and M Cost/year = AOM = $450,000
Benefit per year, AWB = $ 850,000
Equivalent initial cost per year = C
Equivalent salvage per year = S x (A/F, 0.06, 25) = 1,000,000 x (A/F, 0.06, 25)
Let us calculate the interest factors,
The equivalent initial cost per year = AWC = 10000000 x 0.078226718 = $ 782267.18
Equivalent salvage per year, AWS = 1,000,000 x 0.018226718 = $ 18226.72
Conventional B-C ratio = AWB/(AWC-AWS+AOM)
= 850000/(782267.18-18226.72+450000)
= 0.7001
Modified B-C ratio = (AWB-AOM)/(AWC-AWS)
= (850000-450000)/(782267.18-18226.72)
= 0.5235
In this case. both the conventional B-C ratio and modified B-C ratio are less than 1, the project is not acceptable.