Final answer:
The authors of both passages would likely agree that there is a common misinterpretation of coincidences as evidence of cause and effect when it comes to the full moon's effects on human behavior.
Step-by-step explanation:
On which point would the authors of BOTH passages most likely agree? The authors of both passages would most likely agree that people often misinterpret a coincidence as evidence of cause and effect. This is exemplified by the belief that the full moon affects human behavior—a notion that is rooted in folklore but not supported by scientific evidence. The passages you've provided mention Rotton and Kelly's meta-analysis, which found that the statistical evidence does not support the idea that crime rates or odd behaviors are higher during a full moon, despite public belief to the contrary. Therefore, the full moon has no proven effect on human behavior, and instances of crimes or strange behavior occurring during a full moon are likely due to coincidence.