Register

Please answer with an explanation on why whoever's method is wrong thank you

Please answer with an explanation on why whoever's method is wrong thank you
126k views
4 votes
Please answer with an explanation on why whoever's method is wrong thank you

Please answer with an explanation on why whoever's method is wrong thank you-example-1
User Steve Hwang
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

4 votes
Brandon’s method is incorrect because if we continue the pattern, 9 times 1/2 is 4.5. It’s obvious that the square root of 9 is 3. Similarly, the square root of 16 is 4, but 16 times 1/2 is 8. Any number you will try after that won’t work.
User Ali Kiani
by
6.9k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

How do you estimate of 4 5/8 X 1/3
i have a field 60m long and 110 wide going to be paved i ordered 660000000cm cubed of cement  how thick must the cement be to cover field
Write words to match the expression. 24- ( 6+3)
Link Copied!