Register
Please answer with an explanation on why whoever's method is wrong thank you
126k views
4 votes
Please answer with an explanation on why whoever's method is wrong thank you

Please answer with an explanation on why whoever's method is wrong thank you-example-1
User Steve Hwang
by
7.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes
Brandon’s method is incorrect because if we continue the pattern, 9 times 1/2 is 4.5. It’s obvious that the square root of 9 is 3. Similarly, the square root of 16 is 4, but 16 times 1/2 is 8. Any number you will try after that won’t work.
User Ali Kiani
by
6.0k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

8.1m questions

10.8m answers

Other Questions

How do you can you solve this problem 37 + y = 87; y =
What is .725 as a fraction
How do you estimate of 4 5/8 X 1/3
A bathtub is being filled with water. After 3 minutes 4/5 of the tub is full. Assuming the rate is constant, how much longer will it take to fill the tub?
i have a field 60m long and 110 wide going to be paved i ordered 660000000cm cubed of cement  how thick must the cement be to cover field
Link Copied!