Register
This relationship leads to the conclusion that there is no Pythagorean triple of this form that contains the integer 2. Why?
15.1k views
2 votes
This relationship leads to the conclusion that there is no Pythagorean triple of this form that contains the integer 2. Why?

This relationship leads to the conclusion that there is no Pythagorean triple of this-example-1
User Siva
by
5.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes
Is there a shape to look at ?
User Hien
by
5.0k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.6m questions

7.3m answers

Other Questions

What is the value of x? (-4) - x = 5
Can someone help me with 5??? ASAP?
1/7 + 3/14 equivalent fractions
185g in the ratio 2:3
(3x1,000,000)+(3x100,000)+(2x100) what is this number written in standard form?
Link Copied!