175k views
4 votes
In 2001, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled to accept evidence in a trial that was obtained by recording a phone conversation without a warrant.

Which of these is most directly affected by this ruling?
O protection against unreasonable search and seizure
O consent of the governed
Oright to trial by a jury of one's peers
suspension of the writ of habeas corpus

User Nachman
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

The answer is below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering the scenario described in the question, the most directly affected by this ruling is "protection against unreasonable search and seizure"

This is because the approval of a Supreme Court to an issue of obtaining or recording a phone conversation without a warrant will directly affect the individual's protection against the unreasonable search of and seizure of things.

User Dch
by
8.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.