Answer:In recent years, immigration has become a pressing issue that elicits varied opinions and emotions. Sonia Nazario, an influential writer and journalist, effectively presents these similar ideas of immigration-related hardships through the lenses of two distinct genres: a biography, "Enrique's Journey," and an editorial, "Refugees Deserve Better." By closely examining both pieces, one can gain valuable insight into Nazario's approach to this prevalent topic. This essay will compare and contrast the way she advances her ideas in both texts, paying close attention to her use of evidence and application of formal and objective language.
To begin with, in "Enrique's Journey," Sonia Nazario narrates the harrowing story of a young boy named Enrique - determined to reunite with his mother - embarking on an arduous trek from Honduras to the United States (Nazario 7). The biography serves as a compelling account of the various tribulations individuals face throughout their journeys as undocumented immigrants. In contrast, "Refugees Deserve Better" is an editorial piece that discusses the plight of those seeking asylum in the United States in a broader context (Nazario). Despite the differing formats of these works, both emphasize the dire circumstances immigrants face and call for empathy from readers.
Nazario employs well-chosen evidence to support her assertions across both pieces. In "Enrique's Journey," she closely documents Enrique's experiences, providing vivid details about his encounters with gangs on top of trains and his resourcefulness during moments of despair (Nazario 45). Moreover, she references authoritative sources by incorporating statistics from organizations such as Amnesty International to shed light on the staggering number of children who traverse Central America each year (Nazario 23). In her editorial, the authenticity of her claims is supported by data gleaned from various government and non-profit organizations. For instance, Nazario cites findings from Physicians for Human Rights which reveal how "federal immigration courts reject 88% of asylum claims" (Nazario).
In both texts, Nazario adheres to formal and objective language as a means to strengthen her credibility. In "Enrique's Journey," she avoids inserting her personal opinions and refrains from expressing bias, reporting Enrique's experiences with accuracy and sincerity. Similarly, "Refugees Deserve Better" maintains an impartial tone throughout, allowing for a persuasive articulation of the challenges faced by asylum-seekers.
To summarize, Sonia Nazario masterfully presents similar ideas regarding immigration-related struggles through dissimilar genres in "Enrique's Journey" and "Refugees Deserve Better." Through ample use of well-selected evidence and steadfast adherence to MLA guidelines, as well as her application of formal and objective language, Nazario captures the diverse experiences of vulnerable individuals coping with daunting circumstances. Consequently, her works serve as essential contributions to the ongoing discourse on immigration.
Explanation:This is what i put down for my essay, all u need to do is write this in ur own words or copy n paste.......Hope this helps! ;)