Question

What is most closely the meaning of superseded as it is used in the passage below (paragraph 3)?

For centuries no political change has been brought about by the citizens themselves. In the capital great rulers have superseded each other—indeed, even dynasties have been deposed or annihilated, and new ones have started; in the past century even the capital itself was destroyed, a new one was founded far away from it, later on this too was destroyed and the old one rebuilt, yet none of this had any influence on our little town.

A. | verb | gave large sums of money to

B. | verb | questioned

C. | verb | defeated in battle

D. | verb | taken the place of; succeeded

Answer 1

D. | verb | taken the place of; succeeded

Step-by-step explanation:

"Take the place of" or "succeeded" would best replace the word 'superseded' in this passage.

It isn't A because there is no evidence in the passage to support this answer.

It isn't B because there is no evidence in the passage to support this answer.

It isn't C because to supersede does not necessarily connote defeat in a literal sense.

Hope this isn't confusing. Hope this helps! :D