Question

If a new body of evidence were found that directly contradicted the cell theory, groups of scientists would then

Responses


A) allow for experimentation and analysis of results before making a decision. These experiments should look for a large degree of similarity between what the scientist observed and/or calculated versus what the committees of scientists calculate.allow for experimentation and analysis of results before making a decision. These experiments should look for a large degree of similarity between what the scientist observed and/or calculated versus what the committees of scientists calculate.


B) create a brand new theory to contradict the old Cell Theory.create a brand new theory to contradict the old Cell Theory.


C) discard the new evidence idea because theories cannot be changed.discard the new evidence idea because theories cannot be changed.


D) automatically replace the contradiction with this new idea and amend the theory to reflect the new body of evidence.

Answer 1

A) allow for experimentation and analysis of results before making a decision. These experiments should look for a large degree of similarity between what the scientist observed and/or calculated versus what the committees of scientists calculate.

Step-by-step explanation:

In science, it is important to carefully consider new evidence and to subject it to rigorous testing and evaluation. If a new body of evidence were found that directly contradicted the cell theory, scientists would first need to carefully examine the evidence and conduct experiments to verify its accuracy. If the evidence holds up under examination and is supported by multiple independent studies, then scientists may consider modifying or updating the cell theory to incorporate the new evidence. However, it is important to note that this process can take time and may involve multiple rounds of experimentation and debate within the scientific community before any changes are made to the theory.

Answer 2

A) allow for experimentation and analysis of results before making a decision. These experiments should look for a large degree of similarity between what the scientist observed and/or calculated versus what the committees of scientists calculate.

If a new body of evidence were found that directly contradicted the cell theory, it is likely that groups of scientists would allow for experimentation and analysis of results before making a decision about whether to accept or reject the new evidence. This process typically involves conducting experiments to test the new evidence and comparing the results to what is already known about the cell theory. Scientists would look for a high degree of consistency between what they observe and calculate in their experiments and what is predicted by the existing theory. If the new evidence is found to be consistently supported by the experimental results, then it may be considered for inclusion in the theory. However, if the new evidence is not consistently supported by the experimental results, then it may be rejected as incompatible with the theory.