339,239 views
40 votes
40 votes
2)

Jamie runs into a crowded theater and yells "Fire!" People in the theater begin to panic, and some are injured as
they try to escape. In the aftermath, firefighters determine that there was no fire, and Jamie is arrested. Jamie's
lawyer argues that Jamie was only exercising the right to free speech and should not be punished.
Which BEST explains why a judge would consider this argument invalid?
A)
Jamie's actions would be considered slander.
B)
Jamie's actions were subject to due process.
C)
Jamie's actions threatened national security.
D)
Jamie's actions infringed upon others' rights.

User Charles Gomes
by
2.5k points

1 Answer

17 votes
17 votes

Answer:

B

Explanation: Freedom of speech doesnt allow you too yell indangering things. If you enter a plane and yell bomb your putting others in danger.

User TLiebe
by
3.0k points