Final answer:
Investing $1,000 in stocks is not considered an 'investment' by macroeconomic standards, as it doesn't create new productive capacity. Economists reserve the term 'investment' for spending on capital goods that contribute to GDP, like commercial real estate and equipment.
Step-by-step explanation:
Within the context of macroeconomics, when you invest $1,000 in stocks, this would not typically be called 'investment' in the economic sense. Macroeconomists define investment as business spending on new capital goods like commercial real estate, equipment, residential housing construction, and inventories. It involves creating new productive capacity in the economy rather than just transferring ownership of existing financial assets. Therefore, the purchase of stocks is different from business investment in that it does not directly contribute to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which measures economic production and growth.
Stock purchases are considered investments from a personal finance perspective because they can potentially return a profit in the future. However, in terms of economic indicators like GDP, business investment refers to the creation of new capital goods that contribute to producing goods and services within the economy.