Register
Explain why -3 > w > -1 has NO SOLUTION
29.1k views
3 votes
Explain why -3 > w > -1 has NO SOLUTION

User Nzinga
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Explain why -3 > w > -1 has NO SOLUTION​

__________________

Answer

Since w is greater than -1 ( w > -1) it cannot be less than -3

_________________

Can you see the updates?

Do you have any questions regarding the solution?

Explain why -3 > w > -1 has NO SOLUTION-example-1
User Large
by
6.9k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

8.0m questions

10.6m answers

Other Questions

How do you can you solve this problem 37 + y = 87; y =
What is .725 as a fraction
How do you estimate of 4 5/8 X 1/3
A bathtub is being filled with water. After 3 minutes 4/5 of the tub is full. Assuming the rate is constant, how much longer will it take to fill the tub?
i have a field 60m long and 110 wide going to be paved i ordered 660000000cm cubed of cement  how thick must the cement be to cover field
Link Copied!