Question

Turning 16 has long been a rite of passage, as teens head to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get their license to drive, but that may change if conservative state senator Rob Evans has his way. Evans proposes raising the minimum age for a temporary driver’s permit to 16.5, requiring teens to have six months and 50 hours behind the wheel before they can take a driving test. Evans, 66, says that “times have changed” since he was 16 and that today’s teens “do not exhibit the same caution and concentration” his generation did. Clearly, Senator Evans is living in the past. Students need their licenses to get to school, activities, and part-time jobs. Documenting driving hours takes time and money. Call Senator Evans and let him know that this is an unnecessary and ridiculous proposal.

Which details reveal the reporter’s purposes in the editorial? Check all that apply.

using the label “conservative” to make the proposal seem biased
using loaded language, such as the word “ridiculous”
objectively reporting the details of the senator’s proposal
objectively reporting the driving law as it currently stands
using quotes that criticize today’s teens to persuade people to oppose the proposal

Answer 1

The reporter uses language and quotes to reveal their opposition to the proposal, including labeling the senator as 'conservative,' using the word 'ridiculous,' and highlighting quotes critical of today's teens.

Step-by-step explanation:

The details in the editorial that reveal the reporter’s purpose include using the label “conservative” to potentially influence the reader’s perception of the proposal as being biased. By describing Senator Evans as conservative, the editorial might be suggesting that his proposal is coming from a particular political standpoint rather than a public safety perspective. Furthermore, the writer employs loaded language such as the word “ridiculous” to convey a strong opinion against the proposal. This is a technique often used in persuasive writing to sway the audience towards the writer’s viewpoint. The use of quotes that criticize today’s teens is also intended to persuade readers to oppose the proposal by suggesting that the senator’s perspective is outdated and unfair in its assessment of teen behavior.