453,155 views
39 votes
39 votes
Given the incomplete proof below, what is the missing reason for the statement in step 4?

Given the incomplete proof below, what is the missing reason for the statement in-example-1
User Jcwayne
by
2.5k points

1 Answer

20 votes
20 votes

Answer:

ASA Congruence Theorem

Explanation:

Already,it has been stated and proved that two angles (<ABC and <CAB) and an included side (AB) in ∆ABC are congruent to corresponding two angles (<ABD and <DAB) and an included side (AB) in ∆ABD.

Therefore, based on the ASA Congruence Theorem, ∆ABC is congruent to ∆ABD.

The missing reason is "ASA Congruence Theorem"

User Markus Lausberg
by
3.1k points