Question

Why would intellectual property theft fit the mission of private technology security and possibly be more applicable than it is to law enforcement?

a. Law enforcement has sought to transfer authority at the federal level for technology crimes to come under the purview of private security firms.

b. Private security officers simply have more technological training than law enforcement.

c. Law enforcement does not tend to get involved in white-collar crime.

d. Private security firms specialize in a wide range of areas and crime, which often require more manpower and time than law enforcement has to give.

100 points

Answer 1

C) Law enforcement does not tend to get involved in white-collar crime.

The job of dealing with white-collar crime typically is given to the FBI. In recent years however, the amount of crime in this field has skyrocketed, giving birth to a whole new field of private technology security. Law enforcement is unable to assist in white-collar crimes without information and data passed on from the FBI or other technology security companies.

I hope this helps! :)