366,480 views
6 votes
6 votes
See question in attached photo.
Answer question 4b and 5c​

See question in attached photo. Answer question 4b and 5c​-example-1
User Tinkerer
by
2.7k points

1 Answer

8 votes
8 votes

9514 1404 393

Answer:

4b: 8.6 m/s²; 1.3×10^5 N; 2.1×10^4 N decrease

5c: -1.6×10^12 J; -1.6×10^12 J

Explanation:

4b

i) The acceleration due to gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the objects. The distance to the shuttle is ...

1 + (5×10^5)/(6.4×10^5) = 69/64 . . . times the radius of the earth

Then the acceleration due to gravity at the height of the space shuttle is about ...

(10 m/s²)(64/69)² ≈ 8.6 m/s²

__

ii) The weight of the space shuttle at that height is about ...

F = ma = (15000 kg)(8.6 m/s²) ≈ 1.3×10^5 N

__

iii) The loss of weight will be ...

ΔF = m(a1 -a0) = (15000 kg)(10 m/s² -8.6 m/s²)

= 1.5×10^4×1.4 N = 2.1×10^4 N

____

5c

i) The gravitational potential energy is given by ...

U = -GMm/r

where M and m are the mass of the earth and the rocket, respectively.

U = -(6.67×10^-11)(6.0×10^24)(2.5×10^4)/(6.4×10^6) ≈ -1.6×10^12 J

__

ii) At a height of 3×10^4 m, the denominator in the above expression changes from 6.4×10^6 to 6.43×10^6. This changes the gravitational potential energy by a factor of 6.4/6.43 to -1.6×10^12 J

(Note: we're carrying only 2 significant figures in the result in accordance with the rules for precision in such calculations. The change is noticeable at the level of the 4th significant figure, less than 1/2%.)

User Marqueed
by
2.9k points