Final answer:
Molly's lawsuit against Bed Bath and Beyond for her son's injury from a defective blender might be impacted by the statute of limitations. This law sets a time limit for filing legal proceedings, and if the limit has passed, Molly's case could be dismissed regardless of the retailer's potential negligence in providing a safe product.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Molly’s situation involving the blender that caused injury to her son, if she were to bring a lawsuit against Bed Bath and Beyond, the defense might argue the concept of statute of limitations. The statute of limitations is a law that sets a maximum time after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated. If Molly brings the lawsuit after the statute of limitations has expired, she may be barred from winning her tort case, depending on the jurisdiction's specific time limits for filing such claims.
The responsibility to ensure product safety falls on sellers and manufacturers; thus, if the blender was defectively designed or had inadequate warnings, Molly could have grounds for a product liability lawsuit. In the event that the statute of limitations is still effective, Bed Bath and Beyond would have to defend against claims of selling a defective product that resulted in injury. The outcome would greatly depend on Molly’s ability to demonstrate that the retailer was negligent in providing a safe product.