Question

Identify the point of disagreement between the two viewpoints. Then write a

sentence that synthesizes this information to form a conclusion about the topic.
Viewpoint 1:
Human cultures around the world feature groups of people working together within
communities. Though there are those who have been able to live in the wild
independently, their ability to take care of themselves probably came from being
raised by and interacting with other people. Humans are not like some badgers or
jaguars that live and hunt alone. Instead, humans are highly social creatures, similar
to dolphins and gorillas. We build extended social networks that allow us to live
peacefully and comfortably without having to do everything ourselves.
Viewpoint 2:
Beyond being fed and protected as infants and young children, people don't need
communities to survive. The sole function of a community is to pass on and enforce
social customs, such as manners and traditions. These customs are not necessary
for a human's survival. Plenty of people have gone out into the world alone to survive
off the land and discover new things. The skills of survival are innate - we will find
ways to keep ourselves alive, whether we're part of a community or not.

Answer 1

suggest to switch up some words

Step-by-step explanation:

In Viewpoint #1 it talks about how humans living in communities is a positive thing. It says by forming large social networks, we can live in peace and comfort. This way we wouldn’t have to do everything alone or ourselves.

As for Viewpoint #2, it talked about how humans living in communities is a negative thing. The writer thought whether or not humans were part of a community, we would still find ways to survive or stay alive. It talks about how traditions and customs are not necessary for human life.

Both viewpoints discuss humans living in communities. Viewpoint #1 discusses the pros and Viewpoint #2 discusses how it wouldn’t matter if we did or didn’t live in a community. Personally, I believe that we should live in communities because we can all work together.

Answer 2

1. The two points of view on humans living in communities differ.

2. People should choose whether or not they want to be a member of a community or whether they choose to be alone.

Step-by-step explanation:

Humans living in communities, according to Viewpoint #1, is a really positive thing. They think that by forming large social networks, we may live in peace and comfort without having to do everything ourselves. Additionally, our capacity to care for ourselves was most likely influenced by our upbringing and interactions with others.

Humans living in communities, according to Viewpoint #2, is really awful. They think that whether or not we are part of a community, we will find methods to stay alive. The majority of this stems from the belief that social conventions such as etiquette and traditions are not required for human life.