Answer:
i) 2.58
ii) We reject the claim
Explanation:
The number of subjects in the ginkgo treatment group, n₁ = 1,545
The number of subjects in the placebo group, n₂ = 1,524
The number that developed dementia in the ginkgo group = 246
The number that developed dementia in the placebo group = 277
The proportion that developed dementia in the ginkgo group,
= 246/1,545 = 82/515
The proportion that developed dementia in the placebo group,
= 277/1,524
The null hypothesis is H₀;
=
The alternative hypothesis is Hₐ;
≠
The z-test statistic is given as follows;
Therefore, we get;
From the the p-value at z ≈ -1.66 is p = 0.04846.
i) The z-Critical at 0.01 significant level is 2.58
ii) Given that the p-value, 0.04846, is larger than the significant level, 0.01, the p-value is not significant, and we fail to reject the null hypothesis
There is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the subject on the ginkgo treatment and the proportion of the subject on the placebo treatment that have dementia, we therefore reject the claim that the herb ginkgo biloba is effective for the treatment of dementia.