375,242 views
42 votes
42 votes
Ted, a used car dealer, entered into a written agreement to sell a car to Debra, a sixteen year old high school junior. The agreement provided that Ted would replace any defective parts for one year. Debra agreed to pay Ted $200 per month for three years (which she has done). The age of majority for the jurisdiction is eighteen. After six months, Debra's transmission fails but Ted refuses to replace it. If Debra (or a representative on her behalf) brings a lawsuit against Ted, it is more likely than not that the court will rule:_____.

A. Ted will prevail because Debra was a minor when the contract was formed.
B. The contract is illegal.
C. The contract is void.
D. Debra will prevail, as Ted is bound to the contract.

User Imxylz
by
2.9k points

1 Answer

14 votes
14 votes

Answer:

D. Debra will prevail, as Ted is bound to the contract.

Step-by-step explanation:

A minor can enter a contract that is not prohibited by law for minors. For example sale of alcohol or tobacco is prohibited.

When a minor enters a contract they can either honor it or void it before they come of age.

This is different for adults that cannot disaffirm a contract.

So in this scenario where the agreement provided that Ted would replace any defective parts for one year, failure to do so will see Debra prevailing in court. Since she did not void the contract

User Michal Minich
by
2.9k points